Wired Magazine put Peter Brown, CEO of AMC Entertainment, on the "hotseat" this month (a short interview with tough questions). Either Mr. Brown wasn't prepared for his audience, or he's just plain arrogant about the future of motion picture entertainment.
For the most part, Mr. Brown simply defended AMC's decision to not show "Bubble" from Steven Soderbergh not because AMC was irritated at the decision to put the film out on DVD the same week as theater release, but due to the fact that direct-to-video isn't made with the big screen in mind, and the quality isn't as good.
"When you make the decision to go out, we want to take care of you," Mr. Brown says. When asked why surveys showed people like smaller theaters, it's the megaplexes that are the problem, Mr. Brown noted, "Over 250 million consumers buy our product -- that says something."
A couple of thoughts:
- First, Mr. Brown, please be honest. Seriously, it's OK to say we aren't going to support a film that competes on this level, and explain why. For example, your industry makes your money on popcorn, so we can't bring in our own. Fine, we get it. But don't try to tell us that you stop people from bringing in their own popcorn because you're afraid the homemade stuff might not taste as good as yours. That's pretty much what you did here.
- If AMC is truly concerned about the quality of motion pictures they're showing, there are any number of films that probably shouldn't have made it to our local AMC outlet, but did. In the end, we think we're in a pretty big club that believes we're not really looking for Mr. Brown or anyone else to make a value judgment on the movies we see. Let the ticket buyers decide. (We'd also like to note that Soderbergh isn't exactly a hack: he got the first double nomination in the best director category in almost 60 years at the 2001 Academy Awards for "Erin Brockovich" and "Traffic." He won the Oscar for "Traffic." This year he worked on such "low-quality" films as "Syriana" and "Good Night, and Good Luck.")
- Over 250 million people visited an AMC theater because your company owns 5,672 screens (per the AMC Web site). In the end, that means that if your screens are showing movies about 360 days each year, you had a few more than 120 people visit each one of your screens last year. Divide that by three or four showings per screen each day, and it doesn't look like the lines were very long at the ol' AMC last year.
We'd recommend the following:
- Wired reaches a fairly sophisticated audience. Know that before you give answers that will appear -- as these did -- to be less than forthcoming.
- Wired also reaches people that tend to have very high-end home systems. What do you say to those people to get them to come out? "We're not going to show things we think aren't good enough" wasn't the right message.
- "We must be doing something right" in this context was a bad answer. How about, "theater attendance is down, but here are the three things we're doing differently to bring people back."
The way people use media is changing. Those that adapt will thrive. Those that arrogantly defend the status quo will not.